I finished reading David Lynch’s Catching the Big Fish in which he writes a series of brief, blog sized entries about his creative projects and his decades-long practice in Transcendental Meditation. It’s definitely a fascinating read, especially with insights into a creative process. However, there was something off about the way he wrote about meditation that put me off, that struck me as inflationary.
I’ll reserve judgment, considering the lack of detail Lynch provided in his book. But my immediate impression was that Transcendental Meditation, as Mr. Lynch described it, is unbalanced. The practice was described in a purely positive manner in which life becomes like a “fantastic game” and as if everything should be completely peaceful. I’m not saying that one can’t have positive and powerful benefits from an unbalanced practice. But it’s a bit like having an unbalanced diet with only healthy foods – certain important nutrients are missing. Maybe I am misunderstanding him, but nevertheless, that made me think about inflation and flow.
In last week’s sangha, we talked about that deep feeling of connectedness that you experience where everything falls perfectly into place and you hit this sweet spot called flow. The beginner’s mistake is to inflate along with this experience. This is especially common when someone has been severely deprived of connecting experiences for a long time. All of a sudden, they’ll believe they have all the answers and they’re imbued with a certain flavour of specialness.
I used to be deeply concerned with flow when I was young. In my teens, I called it synchronization. I like how the idea of timing played into the concept for me. In my diary from those years, I’m often writing about my sync rate – how the conscious and unconscious mind were in concordance or working at cross purposes. And I felt at the time, even if I didn’t explicitly acknowledge it to myself, that as long as I had my sync rate up and was working hard to keep my psyche well integrated, I was as good as invincible. And truth be told, things often played out like this. Whenever the sync rate was high, I didn’t have to worry about anything and whenever I shirked my duties, life would basically kick my ass. Looking back, I’m sure there was some selective memory going on there to support that hypothesis of mine.
I love this lyric by Bjork where she sings, “Carry my joy on the left, Carry my pain on the right.” Flow doesn’t mean all obstacles external to you move out of your path and everything seems to go your way. It just looks like that to the beginner. A true, honest and profound connection means that your little desires are the obstacles that get out of the way of you receiving life. And a part of that means being able to clear enough space, including the areas that would like things to go the way you want, to give equal share to all aspects of existence.
I think any artist or athlete can share this flow experience where you simply dissolve. I’m playing the piano and all of a sudden I realize that the instrument and I have become this unified unit and my fingers are flying across the keys and whatever sentience or semblance of self that I have is just observing what a rush it is to experience this. You yourself have disappeared, but in turn what you gain is this momentary, unreproducable, beautiful expression of life. It might be joyful, it might be painful, it might be both at the same time, but whatever it is, what was formerly invisible is suddenly visible, present, existing, alive.
August 9, 2011 at 11:33 am
great post. i think the idea of life being a game one can control has aspects of solipsism and if taken too far can lead dangerously to fanaticism. pain can be transcended, but at what cost? pain (loss of control) is a defining part of the human experience and our spiritual connectedness.
August 10, 2011 at 5:26 pm
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’d add that even without factoring in spirituality, the idea of being in control all the time sounds rather boring!
September 11, 2011 at 11:53 am
The “game” aspect is because you are *playful*: enjoying the moment. The “peaceful” aspect is because the inner-innermost “you” is constant, 24 hours a day, throughout waking, dreaming and sleeping: “pure consciousness,” which has no attributes other than being quietly alert.
September 11, 2011 at 12:38 pm
Thanks for your thoughts – your explanations, although brief, make more sense to me than Lynch’s. Are you a practitioner of transcendental meditation?
Edited to add that Lynch is very explicit in saying the kind of peace he speaks of is one in which all war in the world is eradicated.
September 24, 2011 at 7:26 pm
I’ve been doing TM for 38 years now.
The “all war in the world is eradicated” is a reference to the “Maharishi Effect” theory, which asserts that the peacefulness found during meditation has a calming effect on the meditator’s surroundings, most especially other people. The effect is said to be magnified when people practice in groups -the larger, the better.
The theory says that if one percent of a large population starts practicing TM individually, there will be noticeable (at least by careful analysis of statistics) on the rest of the population. If people practice TM in a group, their effect is magnified by the square of the number.
In other words, for a city of 10 million, 100,000 TM meditators will have a noticeable effect practicing as individuals. The same effect would happen if only 320 of them meditated together in a group. For the United States, a about 4 million people practicing TM as individuals would have a measurable effect. About 1800 or so practicing in a group would have the same effect.
For the world, the numbers are: 64 million people practicing as individuals to have a measurable effect, but only 8,000 practicing in a group would have the same effect.
Currently, in the USA, there’s a group of about 1500-2000 people meeting every day, twice a day, for group TM. The daily numbers are posted online http://invincibleamerica.org/tallies.html -the different colors reflect the transition from below the threshold (blue) to well above the threshold (red). Consistent numbers slightly below the threshold might have a measurable effect, but much less than consistent numbers well above the threshold. Fluctuating above and below the threshold wold produce very uneven results (think of the outline of the Mandelbrot Set, which is uniform inside and very interesting right at the edge -“interesting” in this case meaning as in “historically interesting” or “ancient Chinese curse” interesting).
There is an ongoing project to create several groups of at least 8,000 TMers practicing regularly. The largest such group will be in India, with (eventually) 40,000 Vedic Pundits meeting for group TM practice as well as performing ancient Vedic rituals thought to promote peace throughout the world. http://www.vedicpandits.org/establishing-groups-phase-one.html
This is what David Lynch means when he talks about ending all war.
September 25, 2011 at 9:30 am
Thank you for the clarification. That’s a very important point you’ve raised: that the same number of individuals working on their own is not the same as that number working as a group. I’m actually working on a draft about that which will probably be ready to post much later. I meet so many Canadians today who are aware of the need for social justice, equity, etc. but feel they can’t do anything about it so they don’t. And it’s partly b/c Canadians are brought up to be very atomized and individualistic in their approach to human interaction so they are always acting alone. (Side note: why campaigns like buying something with a percentage of proceeds going to a charity is so appealing to Canadians – it’s an action an individual takes). I definitely feel that sanghas are critical in keeping people’s practices integrated with greater society and because the overall effect is stronger. Esp in N. America where people are starved for genuine community and participating in creating shared meaning.
September 21, 2011 at 1:46 am
If one is meeting life with the intention of meeting it anything but peacefully, one has failed to understand the goal of _all_ of the meditation traditions of the subcontinent. The sort of clarity some identify with “control” is called enlightenment. In the Tibetan/Madhyamika tradition, this is often translated as omniscience. Those with more Hindu yoga experience may recognize it as realization.
The game that he is playing in Sanskrit is called lila. It is the play of the entire universe, particularly as understood in the Sakta tradition.
The war which is eradicated is the place from which one has need to create conflict due to lack of understanding. The reactionary mind is stilled. The need to reserve judgment ceases because there is knowledge and recognition of understanding that is inherently receptive.
Ramakrishna is often pointed out for having realized the unity of paths through yoga tantra, Christianity, and Islam. Transcendental Meditation is a technique. It is a practitioner who lacks balance. Nothing in your description indicates a lack of balance or harmony in Lynch, but in how you are receiving him. As moksha, liberation in many useful systems is the reconciliation of opposites (magic), or the direct and unwavering experience of the mind and phenomena as non-dual (i.e. Advaita). This is a very particular sort of ‘balance’.
*Dualistic* thinking in terms of balance and judgment are Libran concepts that have become separative obstacles to unity with the other. Finding fault with the practice of a meditator with decades of experience is a good opportunity to examine the wisdom of your own experience, the depth of your own practice, and the confusion and discord that arise from assumptions. It is war-like, or Mars/Aries when it becomes dualistic and engages the other from the perception of conflict — Libra.
The flow of which you speak is well known to any experienced mediator and is impermanent. Why believe one’s experience of this awareness is special? It is a mistake of the intellect in which the beginner believes that a few steps taken on the path means they are no longer a beginner but better than a beginner. This is a particular powerful expression of ego when comparing one’s practice to one so well established in their tradition. It is the opposite of self awareness because it is projecting the ignorance of the self on another.
All war in the world is eradicated by all people becoming enlightened. It starts with one’s own practice, and the manifestation of that practice in our contacts with others. TKV Desikachar teaches, ‘You know you are progressing in your practice of yoga from the state of your relationships.’ The peace inside is reflected back, and we also meet agitated people more peacefully. You take back your projection and are mindfully present.
Substantive engagement with Sanskrit, the history, traditions and philosophies of yoga (which includes Buddhism) will make the descriptions of practitioners much easier to receive. All war in the world is eradicated when one realizes peace. This can be most easily understood through models of understanding which see the world as always already perfect. The source of suffering is the obscuration of the mind that prevents seeing things as they are and acting from those illusions as if they were real or true. There is some affinity, if not parity, with all enlightenment traditions, notably tantric practices, here. The dualistic mind seeks union (yoga) and when achieved, yes, war is eradicated.
The war within and without is our own resistance to seeing things as they are. As they say, “Be the change you want to see in the world.” There is no reason it has to be a struggle. The cessation of struggle and the modifications of the mind is the goal of Patanjali and Gautama. If one reaches such a goal, why wouldn’t the experience be truly transcendent? That is the name of his practice –> Transcendental Meditation.
In the end, all such questions are resolved on the mat, or the cushion, or the bench, if you prefer that sort of discipline. That is the fruit of correct practice –> direct understanding as wisdom (Skt, jnana / Pali, sampajanna), rather than conceptual understanding which is merely knowledge (Pali, panna).
Remember, you are still young. And this is fortunate.
September 21, 2011 at 6:39 pm
Thank you for taking the time to share such a long and detailed response, ~C.
I included my impressions of Lynch’s book in order to present how his writings have triggered my own thoughts about inflation and flow but it seems this has caused some confusion. Perhaps I should not have mentioned his book at all, but I thought it was a text that would be of interest to readers.
Lynch’s writings are brief and I have been clear in that my reading of his text may not represent his intended meanings. I have also been explicit in that my post was recording my first impressions of Lynch’s book, that I have reserved any judgment of Transcendental Meditation and I certainly have not drawn any conclusions about his practice. Nowhere have I compared myself to Lynch; there is no sound basis for such a comparison.
March 18, 2012 at 3:56 am
I believe that the goal of the David Lynch Foundation is contained in the second part of its name: “for Consciousness Based Education and World Peace.”
I assume he has a personal goal that prompted him to create the foundation.
Before he struck out on his own, Deepak Chopra described part of a conversation he had with TM founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (MMY), which may help illustrate how people with goals and people with no-goals may appear to be the same, behavior-wise:
MMY: When you are in Unity Consciousness, you see that the entire universe is exactly as it should be.
Chopra: But Maharishi, if that is the case, why are we working to establish ‘Heaven on Earth’?”
MMY: That is exactly as it should be, also. And… it is a lot of fun!
March 18, 2012 at 3:02 pm
Hello again and thank you for sharing this story. The universe being exactly as it should be, I imagine would never mean staying exactly as it is :)
September 21, 2011 at 7:47 pm
Had a bit of a think about balance/the unity of paths. This is definitely something my teacher has emphasized – that different meditative techniques inform and build on each other and when taught separately, will be integrated. On a somewhat tangential note, I also think it is important to consider points of emphasis/de-emphasis in any teaching practice, as well as any relevant social context (on both ends – creator and readers), with a certain curiousity.
The leap from peace and balance to the idea of everyone being enlightened so all war ceases is something I don’t feel I can comment on really. Is this like a goal of TM? (Lynch describes it as if it were a goal.) What I will say is that there is something deeply human about being very flawed, about our self deceptions and rigid misconceptions and powerful yearnings for control and impermanent things. That is to say, there is something deeply human about the self imposed suffering we create. It’s why writings about our destructive human tendencies written so many years ago still directly applies to modern people who live with very different social contexts and ideologies. The flaws of people are a part of why I love people – including their incredible capacity for cruelty, injustice, and the violation and betrayal of others and themselves. Hm, I think I’ll bring this up at sangha tomorrow…
September 21, 2011 at 8:20 pm
As you progress in the traditions you are engaging, the doctrines of reincarnation/metempsychosis and karma will become much more relevant to these views. Yes, the goal is everyone being enlightened and if one is fortunate enough to have a human body, to have the goal of enlightenment. The zen tradition need not be Buddhist, but the Buddhist influences are from the Mahayana. The bodhisattva vow of Mahayana is to continue to take human rebirth after enlightenment for the benefit of all sentient beings, not just humans. The benefit of all sentient of beings is to be enlightened.
If you do not have these goals, you are interested in wellness, which is what western medicine and technology are extracting from these much deeper traditions. Eventually, this may be very much like skipping dinner because dessert tastes so good, or learning the alphabet, and not bothering to learn how to spell words, write sentences. Straightforwardly sidestepping and avoiding what these practices do in their full form –> produce meaning.
Really, much of what you are interested in is incompatible with the philosophies that inform the practices you have chosen. I am all for adaptation for western students, and one can get real benefit from practicing them without deeper understanding, but when you hold different worldviews, rather than engage a few of the deep and complex philosophical arguments that have taken place over thousands years, it ceases to be yoga and becomes secular, syncretic, or a personal form of belief or mysticism. This describes much of the Western Occult Tradition, so it’s not exactly uncommon. Just don’t call it something it isn’t.
When a personal view is shared with others, as you do here, rather than a systematic and teachable technology of consciousness informed by a tradition, you risk producing a pale imitation or even unintentionally distorting the teachings which have benefited you, and you so value. At the very least, being able to describe where your approach converges and diverges from the general contours of the form is useful.
Interrogating one’s assumptions, teachers, practice, and community can be very helpful. Discernment is as important as refuge and trust. Your intuition will likely take you far enough that if you are patient, that intuition on all manner of matters will be deeply rewarded with confirmation. I have not erected your chart, nor turned a card, nor concentrated on you to such a degree that this idea is informed by a substantive engagement of your person. Based on my own experiences and similar foundations, I trust I am not wholly off-base in that conclusion.
September 21, 2011 at 8:38 pm
Well, this conversation is starting to feel very odd to me, seeing as how you have read so much of my writing, yet have never commented previously and are now telling me how I should use language.
Do you have a name beyond “~C” that you would like to share? A blog? Any reason why you have spent so much time writing these long comments to this one particular post? This deep level of conversation focused on one person is something that would be natural to share between two good friends, a teacher and their student, or people who have a well established relationship, but for two strangers (one of which there is absolutely no context beyond having a command of the english language and an interest in meditation), I think you can see that it’s becoming a rather bizarre exchange in which your intentions are not at all clear.
September 21, 2011 at 7:49 pm
Thanks for your response. I understand that you are taking a position on emphasis that is presumed historic, but is not variable. Just as views are theistic or atheistic, philosophies are not more or less dualistic historically. These are scholarly and philosophical taxonomic categories, not historical trends. Some yoga traditions are dualistic at very mundane levels, but ultimately nondual. What you are describing in terms of balance, inflation, and flow are not possible without committing to a dualistic worldview, consciously or unconsciously.
If you take some time to examine some of the topics addressed more seriously, you will have a much easier time progressing in nondual philosophies and practices, all of which would be unbalanced from the Lynchian point of departure that inspired your post. Advaita and tantra are some of the best known non-dual philosophies, but it is widely recognized and obvious from your presentation of Lynch’s comments that TM and he, too, are a rooted in a non-dual weltanschauung.
As someone who is writing about yoga and Buddhist meditation from a practitioner’s, rather than acharya or guru position, it is useful to know the philosophical foundations of practices like Anusara and zen/Chan/Zen, when properly understood are also nondual.
Wikipedia’s entry on nondualism is a useful place to start untangling the incompatible assumptions rooted in your psychological approach to the world (‘compensatory’), from the practice and analysis of philosophy inside and outside of the academy. Regardless, the psychology of both the 8 limbed yoga of patanjali and Buddhist canonical abhidhamma are also non-dual. Cultural and historic trends have nothing to do with it, and more to do with your own perception and subjectivity which are not receptive to nonduality in practice, but clearly attracted to it in theory.
Best with all of your work. I have been familiar with your writing for some time, and am familiar with the obstacle of exceptional intelligence on the path.
September 21, 2011 at 7:59 pm
Nice to see that you are a long time reader! Thanks for following along the blog. Also, having known people of truly exceptional intelligence, I do not consider my intelligence in any way exceptional – if that is your implication. But I take your point about the obstacles the thinking/rational/dualistic etc. mind presents.
September 21, 2011 at 9:45 pm
I am not a blogger. I am a longtime astrologer and am familiar with your writing from online communities, and checked in to your blog *this time* after reading your review of Pollock’s 78* of Wisdom. I have never participated on a forum where you are active, but have long read widely. I was quite active on Matrix’s ACT list many years ago. Like, a decade ago. If you would like my credentials on more closely related topics, I choose to disappoint you in this public context.
I have not suggested that you use different language at any time. I responded to this:
“The leap from peace and balance to the idea of everyone being enlightened so all war ceases is something I don’t feel I can comment on really. Is this like a goal of TM? (Lynch describes it as if it were a goal.)”
You brought up a point about enlightenment and TM, and I answered. Yes, this is “like, a goal of TM”, as well as yoga and Buddhism — the topics you are currently writing about.
I have written these long posts because I have always recognized you are a gifted person, not only in a wide range of practices, but ability/intelligence. Long on talent and short on peers. I appreciate your performance of modesty where your intelligence is involved, but I don’t mistake it for humility.
You are fully capable of benefiting studying the specific streams I have mentioned without the guidance of a teacher and it is obvious that you haven’t contacted them in your environment or sought them out. If you prefer to continue speculative rumination inspired by other’s practices without having mastered fundamental of your own, writing these long posts is pointless. I understood your values and goals quite differently from your critique of Pollock.
All the best to you in your work and play.